Tag Archives: unemployment

A great week for steelworkers….

1 Apr

Another nail in the coffin of British industry. Tata has decided to bail out (I wonder if Jaguar Landrover uses British steel?). No government representation at the Tata meeting; too busy elsewhere, I guess.

Sajid Javid was busy in Australia; obviously the destruction of a key strategic industry, workers lives, communities was not not high in his consciousness. After all, he is an ex £3 million a year banker. Cameron was scratching his arse over the Belgian calamity. Osborne was probably contemplating his gloomy future as the Chancellor of the failed Exchequer.

It has been revealed that the Brit government blocked EU moves to impose sanctions on Chinese steel dumping. After all, Chinese investment in British nuclear power, transportation and real estate is far more important than working people.

In the same week, figures were published that around 3,000 UK bankers earned over 1 million Euros last year. More than bankers across Europe, and only 55 times higher than the new minimum wage. Not bad for a bunch of coke-snorting unqualified jerks. Of course, they are far more worthy than doctors, care workers, teachers and garbage collectors.

The Qatar hosting of the World Cup has made the headlines again. Allegedely, contractors have been exploiting and abusing workers. Come on, this is standard practice across the Middle East. Even in those esteemed countries like Saudi Arabia and Bahrain, where our government endorses dictatorship, restrictions on free speech and enslavement – in exchange for defence contracts. Unlike most government bullshit, proclaimed ignorance of the harsh reality and bland reassurance, this story is true. The workers are abused by their own governments and businesses, employers in Qatar and “our valued partners” is endemic.

 

 

Advertisements

Ian Duncan-Smith: Deluded – yes. But how deluded?

20 Feb

On the infrequent occasions that Ian Duncan-Smith raises his shining head above the parapet, he demonstrates his willingness to espouse hearsay and assumption, rather than facts.

This week, he stated that there are “over 500,000 unfilled jobs” in the UK. Nice round number. If he derived that cheery information from the direct.gov vacancy database, then his delusions are serious indeed.

The old Jobcentre Plus database was merged into the direct.gov system a year ago. It was a bad system, but merging two bad systems does not make one good one.

A simple check indicates the validity of any vacancy figures derived in this way. A search for all jobs within 15 miles of Harrow throws up 100 ‘vacancies’ for the period 1 November to 18 February. Of that 100, 14% are self-employed, 8% are temporary, 5% are vacancies such charity or utility sales and at least 6% are ‘recycled’ (on the system almost permanently, but with the posting date changed). So at least 33% of the ‘vacancies’ are dubious in the extreme. Nothing wrong with a commission-only sales job – even though the long-term unemployed are unlikely to have the self-confidence to give it a go. Add to this the immediate loss of benefits and a turnaround time of 6 to 10 weeks for processing a new claim; we can see exactly how viable these vacancies are. Better the bare existence afforded by JSA than the risk of no income at all for over 2 months.

Of course, the integrity of the database is so highly regarded that the NHS, the Civil Service and most Local Authorities do not even put their vacancies on there! In fact even the DWP does not advertise there.

You think that 100 is too small a sample? Try this for size: search for shop-worker vacancies within 75 miles of central London. Result: 293 vacancies. But 224 of them are permanent. Try care jobs: 200 jobs, only 81 permanent; of the 200, most are via agencies and therefore tend to be ‘nebulous’ in terms of actual existence.

So c’mon IDS, let’s have some real facts and stop relying on the output of your own department. Put a wig on and join the jobseekers at a few Jobcentres, or perhaps try applying for some of the jobs on your website and see how many really exist.

We can’t help you!

21 Nov

The Minister for Work & Pensions, Ian Duncan-Smith,  is right on the money when he says that too many people are not working in this country. Hurrah! His plans to reform the creaking complexity of the benefit system are necessary too. Another hurrah!

But. And but again. First and foremost, he has to ensure that his own department is working efficiently. Even moderate efficiency would be a major leap forward from the current shambles.

“We can’t help people like you – older, experienced, professional” is a verbatim quote from one Jobcentre employee. Along with “we don’t have any funds for training”. Or how about an appointment with an advisor cancelled because she was late back from lunch and had forgotten how to log into her PC?

The doddering inefficiencies of the system were inherited by IDS, but surely some of them should have been addressed during the 6 months since the coalition came to power?

In 2009 I wrote to one of his predecessors at the DWP, Tony McNulty; a man with many jobs on his CV during his 12 years in government. I sought to inform him that his department was in crisis. Add my quotes from Jobcentre employees to the following list.

  • The phoney New Deal and Programme Centre programmes, largely outsourced to the private sector under Jobcentre Plus contracts. My own experience of these programmes involved attending a ‘training centre’ for 4 hours weekly. In reality, this was an internet café – without the benefit of even moderately good coffee. The training offered was aimed at those with poor literacy, numeracy and IT skills. Overall the ambiance was one of swearing, disorder and dope-smoking in the car park.  Never mind. The aim of the game a key strategy for masking the true extent of unemployment; never mind the quality!

 

  • The employment element of the direct.gov website rivals tabloid newspapers for the integrity of its information. A brief search shows that too many jobs are duplicated, are dubious in their authenticity or have been on there for months if not years!

 

  • A turn-around time greater than 10 weeks is typical when dealing with the Jobcentre Plus and Pension Service departments. Is this good enough?

McNulty’s response to my heads-up (after chasing) was a 2-month old press release informing me that “the government was spending an extra £500 million to help the unemployed”. Where did it go? Where did the promise of counselling for the long-term unemployed go?

And IDS, don’t hide behind ‘that was the other mob’. The madness continues. A friend of mine lost a week’s JSA because she applied for 3 jobs in one day, rather than spreading her applications over a week! Poor reward for endeavour.



Experts, experts, experts!

29 Dec

Back in the day when news reached us by steamer, horse or pigeon, major news events had a lot of impact. In the global village news travels fast. We can watch wars in real time and listen live to “our correspondent” on the scene and live on cam.

Seemingly every news event is rapidly followed by “expert” comment. I can picture editors and presenters driving their researchers to find someone who knows something about this.

Perhaps, like me, you are naive enough to imagine that an ‘expert’ is someone with a comprehensive knowledge of their subject, perhaps even someone who has actually been there and done that. Pretty hard to believe when you listen to / read the unqualified, often inaccurate tosh that is printed or broadcast on any news day.

Terrorism, the Arab world, Islam, unemployment, the economy – you name it, there’s an expert in it. One could be forgiven for imagining that some learned institution is offering post-graduate courses in ‘Being an Expert’. Why are we so willing to listen to, or worse still, take seriously, these individuals? Look where it gets us: Iraq (wmd experts); global economic collapse (economists & banking experts); mass unemployment (CIPD luminaries); house prices (rising or falling – experts predict both!).

So let’s get real. Ask your granny or gaze at the tea leaves; you would have a better chance of getting a realistic assessment.